Page 1 of 1

Re: UPDATED [THEME] Lingonberry (v2.0)

Posted: Wed May 03, 2017 9:28 pm
by diego
Hi, really nice theme! thanks.
I will share your site and theme on Facebook.

Re: UPDATED [THEME] Lingonberry (v2.0)

Posted: Mon May 08, 2017 11:14 pm
by Edi
Why not add the theme to the repository? ;-)

Re: UPDATED [THEME] Lingonberry (v2.0)

Posted: Tue May 09, 2017 2:07 am
by Edi
Either I can it explain to you or add it for you.

Re: UPDATED [THEME] Lingonberry (v2.0)

Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 12:10 pm
by Edi
The theme is now in the repository, and can be downloaded from:

https://themes.bludit.com

Thank you for your addition!

Re: UPDATED [THEME] Lingonberry (v2.0)

Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2017 4:23 pm
by acrox999
My port was more of a quick job since I just wanted it to run on my blog. :lol: But it's good to see someone interested in it as well. :D

I wanted to see the improvements made and learn from them but what happened? The theme is barely usable and your blog seems to be gone as well. :?

Re: UPDATED [THEME] Lingonberry (v2.0)

Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2017 9:20 pm
by diego
The user jeverett have some discussion on the chat and she/he delete his blog with Bludit, is a shame because she/he made a good stuff for Bludit.

Re: UPDATED [THEME] Lingonberry (v2.0)

Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2017 11:26 pm
by Edi
acrox999 wrote: Sun Aug 06, 2017 4:23 pm The theme is barely usable and your blog seems to be gone as well. :?
What do you mean with barely usable? Are there any problems with the theme?

Re: UPDATED [THEME] Lingonberry (v2.0)

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2017 9:36 am
by acrox999
Edi wrote: Sun Aug 06, 2017 11:26 pm What do you mean with barely usable? Are there any problems with the theme?
I'm sorry, it's not unusable, it just doesn't look like Lingonberry anymore rather.
Maybe those changes are intentional?

Re: UPDATED [THEME] Lingonberry (v2.0)

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2017 11:18 am
by Edi
I will have a look at it.

Re: UPDATED [THEME] Lingonberry (v2.0)

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2017 11:38 am
by acrox999
I think it was a simple matter of more things removed that it should've been inside the CSS. And maybe some changes to the layout itself.

I'd say this is "modified", rather than "improved". That's what I meant when I say it might be intentional.